|
|
|
EMPLOYMENT LAW BULLETIN
Vol. 07, No. 9
Courtesy of ESKRIDGE LAW A recently published California Court decision has offered clear guidelines to help employers with the often confusing issue of whether an employee qualifies for the administrative exemption to the overtime requirement. If an employer mis-classifies an employee as exempt, therefore not paying him/her overtime, the employer runs the risk of having to pay back overtime pay, interest, penalties, and attorney fees. In Eicher v. Advanced Business Integrators, Inc., the court said an employee must satisfy ALL of the following five requirements to classify for the administrative exemption under California law:
What you should do: Before designating an employee as exempt, be sure to carefully review the actual duties and responsibilities of the person's position. Keep in mind that job titles reflecting administrative classifications alone may not reflect actual job duties and therefore, are of no assistance in determining exempt or nonexempt status. The actual determination of exempt or nonexempt status must be based on the nature of the actual work performed by the actual employee. If in doubt, err on the side of classifying the employee as non-exempt, and pay them overtime for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day or 40 hours per week. If you have any questions regarding the classification of an employee, you should contact an experienced employment law attorney. ESKRIDGE LAW may be contacted by phone (310/303-3951), by fax (310/303-3952), or by e-mail (geskridge@eskridgelaw.net.) Please visit our website at www.eskridgelaw.net.
|
||||||||||||||||